Students in the School of Architecture of Granada (ETSAG) registered project Thesis (PFC) and those students not registered in the same are also interested in Assembly met on December 1, 2010, 12 and 26 January 2011 to bring the conflicts under discussion with the project so career certification of architects.
Together we have come to the conclusion that there are serious problems with the PFC approach, in terms of organization, information and evaluation. Students who signed this Annex require the following changes:
- EXPLANATORY STATEMENT PRIOR TO THE COURSE OF ALL ITEMS BEFORE FINAL DRAFT OF YOUR CHOICE The student.
- Creating UPDATED DOCUMENTS all the requirements and documentation to hand, demands and criteria of each of the areas that compose the courts, calls and teachers assigned to each subject, PFC Classroom programming, dates of the stages set, etc. FOR EACH ITEM. (The ideal way to publish these documents would be the site of the school.)
- FITNESS HOURS OF CLASS AND TUTORIALS TO PRICE OF CREDIT.
- Track THE TEACHERS FOR THE GOOD PERFORMANCE OF THEIR DUTIES AS GUARDIANS PFC.
- CONSISTENCY BETWEEN THE DEMANDS OF THE COURT AND THE KNOWLEDGE TO BE TAUGHT IN SCHOOL.
- ensuring anonymity of the student during the grading process.
- PRESENCE IN EVERY COURT OF PROFESSOR INVITED
- GIVE TRUE IMAGE OF IMPORTANCE TO THE GUARDIAN OF PFC
To do this, students will get "Certificate" or written binding of the tutors who qualify as eligible in each of their areas when they see fit.
(In this regard, the DEA has drafted a specific proposal)
- addition to these proposals, FULL COMPLIANCE OF RULES PFC
0 comments:
Post a Comment